The 20/20 Interpretation

The 20/20 Interpretation

The hypothesis formulating and evolving in my consciousness has achieved an interesting meta state of self-assembly as it explores relationships as virtual, evolutionary experiments that condense predictive power of modelling.  Currently, I am collating the derivations and concepts I have observed to assemble an additional 'book'; this will serve effectively as a fourth part to the existing textrixology base that is i, in the palm of my mind

The new project has tentative title:

It Has Not Escaped

being: our notice that the re-interpretations and extrapolations of the fractal universe, as machine, has folded itself into function

I hope to have this project finished, available to observe as whole, within the coming weeks.  The following serves as abstract and introduction,

Best Regards,

John

JSM  10:52 AM, October 11 20/20

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

20/20 Interpretation: Abstract

Subject: 

the fractal 'universe, as machine' hypothesis describing time as held in independent inertial systems: implications on observation and consciousness

What does this describe?:

What can be outlined is a fairly complete description of reality: how it plays out in our three dimensions as energy in waves and, importantly, how this corresponds to our perception of time and the nature of information.  It can be considered as extending Einstein's 3+1 description and, as re-interpretation of the physics concepts since, may allow the current standard model to continue to the next level of predictions as time/change is properly accounted.  

It seems a description within objective realism and perhaps can be considered as presenting a hypothesis of 'universe, as machine', composed fractally, of machines.  In the current hypothesis framework, the universe is real in that an object composed of energy has one future which becomes shared, eventually, as independent observers merge independent time.  A number of conundrums such as EPR/Bell's Inequality observations ('spooky action at a distance') become understandable and predictable and larger outstanding questions such as dark energy and dark matter become mechanistic phenomenon.

Why has this assembly of concepts been cryptic?:  

The hypothesis is boot-strapping and started as modeling wave behavior and concepts in universe evolution.  The over-arching, self-contained construct is challenging to erect as each assumption must meld with other re-interpretations which would date back to the beginnings of post-Einstein physics.  As such, physicists seem to have been  exploring a non-productive local minimum in particular vis-à-vis accounting for time and change.  These emerge as concepts during the modelling which informs the interpretations of dynamic and non-dynamic energies that underlie concepts in how time & information may relate to consciousness and observing. 

In addition to the boot-strapping challenge, the mathematics do seem to have an effect on cognition/communication which perhaps underlies some of the more erratic psychological behaviors attributed at times to physics and math research.

How does this system function?:  

To understand the arrangement and function, it is necessary to reinterpret existing physics observations and to extrapolate new concepts.  The following serves as introduction to the re-interpretations:

0)  Hosting maths/forces:

a: energy is held in patterns in maths called elliptics, revealed at Planck scale

b: collapsible - the universe can compact to a point and grow as large as needed

- expansion occurs through cubic subdivision of space increasing step number

- elliptics encode truly random information with every point in space unique

c: three dimensions - all action plays out in our observable realm of dimension 3 - 4 

(we can ignore higher dimensions)

d: passive - all forces devolve to the concept of parsimony/economy

consistent with the Principle of Least Action

e: highly symmetric - any and all actions are fully reversible

- the future is explored as the direction orthogonal to E/M

- many processes occur beneath more irreversible changes we experience as time

- our universe asymmetry derived and extrapolated from founder effects

1) Cyclic Universe: 

Evolving system: the universe is fully cyclic with our current big bang just the latest

Steady State conditions follow thermodynamic equilibrium

2) Energy as Information

- is held in patterns/waves:

- highly duplicated early in the cycle during the inflationary period

- energy tends to degrade and dissipate to the outside environment of the universe as the universe cools, driving simplification

Condensed Energy:

- residual energy has the potential to condense, as local energy minimum, to complexity

- these are pattern arrangements that we recognize

ex: waves/'particles', atoms, planets, galaxies, etc

Fundamental condensations of energy occurred during big bang/inflation: 

a) non-dynamic/3D

- as folded and resonance-stabilized, 3D arrangements

- example: Electron with tetrix geometry 

- these can change transiently to a cubic arrangement, e.g. upon interacting with a photon 

b) dynamic/2D

- energy condensed as arrangements of 2 D (planar), stackable quasicrystalline arrays 

- necessarily in constant evolution, hosted by E and M fundamental fields 

- can self assemble as fractally-composed rays and webs

- these can explore the future in the direction orthogonal to condensed E/M planes

Pattern/Wave Collapse: 

- these energy patterns can develop symmetries that allow equilibrium of collapsed and reformed pattern

- this process can involve wave inversion which serves as backstop to ratchet processes forward

3) Basic Universal Machine:

the basic functional machine used to create and record complexity is a 

a) core unit assembled of charged (structured E/M), non-dynamic, folded energy 

- for example, an electron, an atom or a larger assembly such as a molecule, etc

b) scaffolded on this charged core is a web of dynamic, inertial energies

- these form both rotational and forward momentums which are in continuous flux

- necessarily permeate through and fully encase the overall, assembled  core pattern

Photons: the dynamic inertial energies can exist without a supporting core but with very limited complexity/information as photon

- the photon is re-interpreted as carrier of inertia between core assemblies.  

Motion/Fields: these machines have a passive mechanism encoded in the inertial systems to explore and move as coordinated assembly across space with inherent drag leaving wake that is fields:

- this disruption expands space that would naturally compact like an accordian

- thus, without the functioning of these machines, space would not expand and revert to a point

Dynamic Inertial System scaling: post inflationary period, assemblies of charged arrays holding complexity and information can become quite large but always will be permeated through* and surrounded with a web of dynamic inertial energy structures derived from these fundamental E/M structural elements

- information system necessarily originates at the quiescent center of rotation of each assembly

- passive mechanisms distribute the inertial energies which guide each waveform component of the assembly through space and explore futures based on energy distribution

- the dynamic system keeps the permeated/encased assembly as time coordinated

- upon disruption, the system fragments to individual assemblies with reformed, independent time webs

4) Time/Change: 

- is experienced as information is held in these dynamic (constantly refreshing themselves) quasicrystalline arrays of patterns that encode both the information and power of inertial energies 

Quasicrystalline arrays can also be considered purely as information that retains memory of its history

- in such system, time is local for each object but upon condensation of objects, the times will adapt largely to the time of the object with more energy (via passive processes guided by the principle of least action)

- a universal Memory Motif: these fundamental planar quasicrystalline patterns stabilize as helical/anti-helical stacks which scale from the level of Planck to our observable universe where they function as time/information sinks

Example of an E/M independent object (one that is in independent rotational equilibrium) maintaining its own time merging its time as it undergoes the process of merging location with another object:

consider: a figure skater, leaping

- upon being airborne and as an independent rotating object, each future position in the universe at each moment is encoded in the onboard net of quasicrystalline arrays as it keeps the energy organized to maintain the object as intact

- upon touching the ice, the time web in the object re-aligns with the much larger rotational object as the objects re-merge their inertial web and the future is now much more dependent on the motion of the earth

Implications for Consciousness and Observations

Where the modelling started: 

-  simple considerations of energy as modular maths and geometries as held in a point

- & rigorous thermodynamics approach: we observe an evolving, steady state universe   

As frame-worked currently, the hypothesis derived from these origins predicts that our consciousness must be contained within an assembly that is permeated and encased by a highly dynamic web of E/M-mediated rays that are inherently capable of encoding and maintaining information as it maintains the time registration of an inertial independent assembly. 

Within this framework, reality would be considered objective as independent energy assemblies will condense to a single future with the series of energy wave collapses encoding the objective history as part of a single, virtual quasicrystalline assembly initiated from and extrapolated since the most recent big bang/inflation.    

Observers maintain independent time as part of the on-board, dynamic information system within the E/M-mediated ray web.  Upon merging with a larger energy assembly at any location (as unique in the elliptic pattern) in the universe, the smaller will tend to adapt the momentum of the larger, as held by the virtual quasicrystalline arrays, and thus adopt as well the time as that held by the larger assembly.  

*black hole, the exception, is rather interesting indeed is these models