on Fermat's Random Walk

Subject: Fermat's Random Walk

John McCarty <@geemail.com>

3:46 PM (17 minutes ago)

: : : diaspera : : :

for you math nerds (others: go back to sleep) -

this is really interesting - the photo includes, in shorthand, a result from some stochastic studies that I thought so fundamental a couple of years ago, to actually write on the wall, over in some corner, to keep in literal mind. One sees the Fermat's description, that I provide in my analysis of the proof, of the different dimensions reflected here in this stochastic walk concept. What is happening in our three dimensions is that the cubing effect is to blow us out of the water in the sense that we can get lost as unique (even with a random walk) but, any two dimension object will end up home.

Primes correspond to the elliptics points of infinity* that are spread through space at some depth down somewhere: both support uniqueness hence, our existence. When you start cubing primes, they end in places in the cardinal maths where they can't get back - that is what my Fermat's Last Theorem analysis shows. They end up as lines that need to all converge (but, alas, cannot) as necessary to allow the primes, once a number is cubed, to go orderly back down [you can think of it that they paint themselves into the corner and then need to keep going, out the window to get to the bathroom again] : hence cubic background space cannot randomly collapse back as does readily occur essentially anywhere, but restricted to two dimension in the behaviour of the quasicrystals (such math allows our energy to function as I can describe in the physics as they tend naturally in the mirrored, chiral maths to stack and thus pulse).

* the short and quick solution, btw, to the Reimann hypothesis