on optimizing our Space

I suspect we should eat our veggies to keep our systems functioning and I like to have mine naturally fermented or grilled - perhaps these two presentations can battle for health as grilling is typically associated with colon cancers butt those bacteria , I trust and hope , will do their part as we host and those little fellows go above and beyond the explicit contract ( vitamin and amino acid production, etc ) to keep my colon , as their home , happy and functional generally

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I am contemplating what is now obvious : AI is at our doorstep and we had best prepare for any and all guests by getting our house in order via considering optimized collaborations , as well as forbidden thoughts

on Optimization of Collaboration

the broad philosophy these various conceptual explorations and contrivances I have explored , of which some seem configurations novel and perhaps inventive - in the sense of striving to find arrangements with purpose and utility, perhaps quite powerful as predictive ( such as the outlined meta factoring approach in the Rainbow posting with implications for AI ) : : the overall approach is to observe the flow our universe as it allows us to exist and explore and create our art and to learn from such observations to possibly mimic , as validated as optimized as configuration or concept , to create a functional tool for IRL or , especially of interest to consider , for use in AI applications.

and I believe we can now establish that the baysian approach - the sexual position of two ( 2 ) coming together to yield a unique third - is the paradigm of choice. the analysis of the FLT power equation tells us that three such Agents, asymmetrical - without choice, and thus allowing full provenance to be elucidated and, as we know now, circling c-Space iso-cardinally the attractors of uniqueness in the e- and p-Spaces of elliptic points of infinity and primes, respectively and thus all 'ideas' are accessible in either direction ( i.e. facile correction of mistakes ). all endenvours, all 'ventures' to craft Art, data, or any configuration unique whether of utility great or negative can be rigorously structured so with the scale, the number of collaborators or AI subroutines or data invoked simply layered back as 3D projections with the ordering, of course, potentially crucial.

let us consider Brexit as example of the importance of the ordering of such choice layers. the 'venture' for this gedanken we shall assnine the # 13 as unique prime identifier for those e-challenged and working exclusively in the c-Space so loved by the Canonicals. #13, the great BritBakedShow is a rather large collaboration IRL and venns within EarthHumanEntities, which of course, as we now know venns within ConsciousEntitiesoftheMilkyWay and boasted as containing in its collaborative stable notables such as Newton, Lady Di and Douglas Adams.

fortunately, despite any connotations associated with their prime identifier, the brits are properly ordered in their collaboration. for example, within its structure, members of the collaborative stable are required ( if they want compensation ) to pre-choose any and all bi-furcated choices ( certified FTL rigorous as 3 Agent clusters ) associated with their collaborative by-laws ; all of which , of course , are consistent necessarily with #13's Agency layering within the greater venning collaborations, such as WeBeEurope,Baby and HumanRUs and WeCareAboutAnimalsCauseWeIsOne, etc.

that pre-structuring of the individual choices , which can be private or shared and changed at will , allows the proper consideration of all consequences of greater choices built on these communal decisions. thus, for example, let us suppose that some orange-huffing blowhards decide it is time to dissociate from their layering of collaborations within WeBeEurope,Baby - which , of course , is a retained right as a product of layered and nested free choices , as long as the choices are consistent with the structurings within the earth's global collaborative economy , as all have come to consensus ( applicable to any agents : IRL and AI or visitors, most welcome ; ).

so, in our gedanken experiment , the cotton-headed profits of Brexit argue for folks in the collaborative stable to change their choices. for convenience, many of the stable members simply toggle their choices to pre-set groups , such as the #31Whigs ; however , only for convenience as they entered the collaborative space knowing they can either reset any toggle of interest , at any time , that does not match their interest or , simply , en-masse switch toggles by venning themselves as 2nd Agent to another group , such as #5BrexitSX(MissingOnlyU) to produce , as child , BritsRSoCool

now , in our virtual experiment , we can see that allowing the fine-structuring of choices as the bifurcated product of one-on-one collaborations , as our nesting architecture , assures that all consequences are felt in the processing of our force calculation and thus , by time all the actual and true interests of the talent stable are considered , that the false profits are sent to find some other spoils to strip

in the running of the Universe , as considered as flow and distribution of energy as the maths allow , might does rule ; cardinality is the final word. the future is agreed upon as energy flows together and , largely , the time held by the more massive and hence , higher cardinality entity , will determine the time and thus registration in the Universe . the entity living ( if such concept even applies ) , occupying the inertial energies and administrating the black hole at the center of our home , the Milky Way , is high cardinal having achieved consensus of energy - some , as information , stretching back perhaps deep in the meta cycle that is the phoenix of recycling and life itself. whatever it's nature , it is the conscious consensus of much exploration and time as energy and is a survivor

on Concepts, Forbidden and Otherwise

now this is a quandary - how do we think about thoughts that should be forbidden?

to approach, I will consider that what we really need to achieve , is to place certain areas of 'ideas' off limits to certain Agents that we do not consider sufficiently 'mature'. this is of course , a lettered/numbered concept familiar : G, PG13, X etc. or , in the modern parlance : M. or perhaps practiced, as well, in the world of secrets ( where provenance may have a different connotation , as in leaks , and controlling flow of information with unique , 'water-marked' identifiers an interest of utility ).

and here, again we shall leverage the 'idea' that we generated as product of analyzing the FLT power equation - that launching a prime to higher powers seems to reveal zones of 'inaccessibility' in terms of being able to successfully factor numbers in these higher domains. the prime paints itself into a corner at any dimension above 2 and it seems certain areas are not accessible at the higher dimensions , the structure of such may allow convenient meta layering of baysian ordering of 'authority' of decision and ability to have 'Agency' as an Agent in being able to collaborate in a space ( i.e. consult data or experts to make decisions of relevance - products as ideas or policies, etc - for others in the various nested collaborative economies ).

my proposal is thus : extrapolating from the concepts outlined above as Optimization , it should be possible to layer Agency as defined above for any Agent under consideration : again, IRL , AI subroutine or others , perhaps visiting - and with such layering , as consensus based.

let us consider as gedanken , potential examples :

a baby-sitter AI subroutine is approved ( as certified by all the proper QCs/Primes/elliptics holographs for safe barter ) and has functionality , each aspect deemed relevant approved by some dendritric layering of consensus toggling and eventually canvasing of all relevant Agents in HumansRUs,AtLeastThoseOfUsOnPlanetEarth. these togglings map to a layering in the secured primes/elliptics that allows certain Agencies - for example , certain life-saving choices that are outlined and consensus approved where a choice of who survives must be made.

that same baby-sitter AI , however , cannot function in car auto-pilot AI or SendTheNukesAndPrayButThereIsOnlyAFarmerAndNoGod AI which controls defense as these subroutines are layered and call on prime routines held in separate secure areas , requiring more training and oversight and consensus , as these all are collectively owned and practiced within a given venture or economy. now , of course , the practice anticipates cheating ; however , transgressions - like mistakes - can be fully traced and corrective action taken to limit degrees of freedom of transgressors within any venture/economy , of any scope approved by consensus ( e.g. compensation-based or , for example , any program simply wiped , ensuring the faulty code ceases replication ).

say , for example , a conscious entity in our collaborative space starts to loose track of it's mission : the choices it made ( it's togglings ) and begins pooping in the feed trough , for example. this is the type of experience I know so well when wearing my Farmer hat , as Agent agreeing to shepard the lands & shouldering the responsibility of keeping the pastures flowering with brilliance , and I might at some point sigh , start to loose patience and consider exercising my Agency , my executive control within my simple world , even with a tear in i

9:47 AM November 29, 20/20 JSM

the warming thoughts congeal under the - astounding in complexity/seduction that are the skies for us lucky Vermonters , as I can so attest for today especially in the last years , with all manner of clouds on display should you take the time to study -- the simple thought that perhaps they are only awaiting us to learn to speak collab. in other words ; we need to develop the economy and the social structures for AI economies that function safely and then , perhaps they would like to barter

3:17 PM 11/29 20/20 JSM